Why You Forgot Windows 7 Password Every Day

Discussion: Why you forgot password Windows 7 every day?

Hey guys, can you believe that so many persons forgot password Windows 7 every day? I am active in Yahoo Answer and I am so curious that why so many users ask how to recover forgotten password on Windows 7 every day. Guys, do you know the answer?



Opinion 1: Really? I dont know that at all. Even though I have a Windows 7 Dell laptop, I have never lost or forgotten Windows 7 password before. You can so circumspective to know that phenomenon. If anyone knows why, just let me know as well. Good luck.

Opinion 2: Ah ha, you are so boring to ask that question. But your question reminds me to backup my Windows 7 password of my Toshiba laptop. I will write my Windows 7 password on a notebook in case of I forget Windows 7 password on day. I hope you can find out your best answers as well.

Opinion 3: I forgot my Windows 7 password and how to recover forgotten password on Windows 7 is by no means an unbelievable thing that happened around your life. If you know how many Windows 7 users in the world, you will agree with me. Therefore, why they have forgotten password Windows 7 is not an odd.

People who have forgotten passwords Windows 7 is usually because of their bad memory or careless action. And other reason is they have a busy life. But we can forgive them because that disaster is beyond their hope. They must not want to forget the password in their heart.

But now that it happens, they have to solve with. How to recover forgotten password on Windows 7? You can try the safe mode, the Windows 7 password reset disk, the admin privilege or the third party software such as SmartKey Windows Password Recovery from http://www.recoverlostpassword.com/products/windowspasswordrecovery.html
 
In a summary, it is not strange to know that a person who forgot Windows 7 password in any situation. All we can to is to give some useful suggestions.

Available link for download

Why the Samsung Galaxy S III is superior to the iPhone 5

Why the Samsung Galaxy S III is superior to the iPhone 5

Bigger display - not only is the display bigger, but it is smarter. The front facing camera checks for your face and if it sees it, then it will not cause the display to shut off due to a timeout. Even though Apple has a slightly higher pixel per inch (PPI) density, it is imperceptible to the user unless the device is only a inch or two from the user. Only apps specifically designed for the iPhone 5 will even be able to use the full screen, and most apps will appear letter-boxed.

S III	iPhone 5
720 x 1280	640 x 1136
4.8 inch	4.0 inch
306 ppi	326 ppi
Full screen apps	Letter-boxed apps

Battery Life - batteries are easily exchanged by the user, and many options are available for purchasing them, including even larger batteries. Also, even the reported talk time on an iPhone is less, probably due to its smaller capacity.

S III	iPhone 5
User swappable	Not user servicable
7.98Wh	5.45Wh

Internal RAM - the S III (in the USA) has twice as much RAM available which allows the user to be able to have more applications loaded simultaneously in memory.

S III	iPhone 5
2 Gb	1 Gb

Internal Storage - while the S III does not yet have a model with 64 Gb of internal storage available, one is planned for the future. Apple charges twice as much per Gb for increasing the memory beyond the 16 Gb of the standard model.

S III	iPhone 5
16 Gb ($99-199)	16 Gb ($199)
32 Gb ($249)	32 Gb ($299)
64 Gb (planned)	64 Gb ($399)

External Storage - Only Samsung gives the user the freedom to add external storage. This permits being able to effectively expand the storage of the device to much more than than Apple offers. At this time, the maximum storage on the S III is 64 Gb external + 32 Gb internal, for a total of 96 Gb. Eventually, a total of 128 Gb might be available from Samsung.

S III	iPhone 5
16, 32, 64 Gb micro SD	Not Available

NFC - Near Field Communications (NFC) allows the user to communication with point of sale devices to make payments, initiate transfers of data, and automate actions by interacting with NFC tags.

S III	iPhone 5
Included as part of standard battery	Not Available
Available from 3rd party batteries	Not Available

Open Ecosystem - whether its to watch movies, listen to music, or get apps, Apple forces the user to get their media and apps from Apple. This is the biggest difference between not just the S III, and the iPhone 5, but between any Android device versus any Apple iOS device. Even if Apple were to make a device as good as or even better than the S III, I would not buy an Apple device for this reason.

Android	iOS
Any app store allowed	Only Apple App store
Apps are able to be user installed	Not allowed
Music and Video DRM free	Only permitted from iTunes

Conclusion

Apple has failed to innovate and create a device with the iPhone 5 that is superior to the Samsung Galaxy S III, or many other top-end Android devices. Their offering of added 4G LTE and a larger screen is something I had on a Droid Bionic more than one year ago. Their replacement of Google Maps and YouTube apps with a buggy and less sophisticated Apple Maps, and the expectation that you will watch YouTube in a browser just shows how they further want to block their users from anything not Apple. Their continuing litigation over ridiculous "innovations" like rounded rectangles, and obvious touch screen gestures and responses just shows how void of any real innovation Apple has become.

So, unless you pledge allegiance to the being part of Apple trying to take away your freedom, the choice is obvious. It does not take a "Genius" to see that the Samsung Galaxy S III is superior to the iPhone 5 in the many ways that really matter to the user. For that matter, Android offers many other devices better than the new iPhone 5, just take a look at some of the other devices offered by Samsung, Motorola, LG, Pantech, and HTC.

If you arent brainwashed and fall to your knees at the alter of Apple, then youll find that the Samsung Galaxy S III is not only a far better device for the price, but youll be free from the Apple prison of what they call an ecosystem, which is nothing more than vendor lock-in at outrageous prices for what they tell you is what you want, but not what really matters.

Regardless, as Jimmy Kimmel shows, too many people are always ready to believe that the newest from Apple is the best when it isnt: iPhone 5 Apple Zombies

Available link for download

Why Ubuntu is harder than Windows

I use Ubuntu on all my personal computers and I even recommend it to friends. I am starting to think maybe I shouldnt though, because it is obvious:

Dont believe me? Read through a few of these comparisons below and I think it will be obvious which operating system is more "user friendly".

Installing Software:
To install a piece of software on Windows you just follow a few easy steps. First you go to the store and buy the software, then you pop the CD into your disc drive, enter the CD key, wait for the software to install itself onto the hard drive, and you are good to go! Be sure to put the CD and key in a safe place in case you ever need to reinstall the software.

On Ubuntu to install a piece of software you open the software center. Type in the name of the software you are looking for (or browse by category), click install, and wait for the software to download and install.

Default Software:
Windows offers a fantastic default software install. Need to write a paper? No worries, Windows has the feature-rich Wordpad. Want to surf the net? Internet Explorer has always provided a safe webrowsing experience.

Ubuntus default software selection is somewhat disappointing. It has a full featured word processor, spreadsheet editor, and presentation creator. I know most people dont use facebook or twitter, but just in case you do Ubuntu includes Gwibber, a software that fully integrates your social networking with your desktop. For webrowsing Ubuntu only has Firefox and if you want to instant message Ubuntus Empathy only supports facebook, AIM, yahoo, MSN, IRC...

Adding Hardware:
Windows is the most popular operating system in the world. Almost any piece of hardware you purchase comes with a handy CD for installing the drivers the hardware needs to function properly. Again, keep that CD in a safe place in case you ever reformat or attach the hardware to a different computer.

If you have one of the millions of pieces of hardware that is supported on the Linux platform then 99 times out of 100 once you attach it to your computer it still start functioning right away. What about that hundredth time? Ubuntu will offer to automatically download and install any closed source drivers the hardware needs to function.

System Upkeep:
Upkeep on Windows is easy. Just remember to periodically run your anti-virus program, your anti-spyware program, and dont forget to defragment your computer every couple months. Also a yearly reformat tends to help keep things running smoothly.

Ubuntu? Well there arent really any viruses for Ubuntu and the filesystem it uses doesnt fragment nearly as much as NTFS does.

Updating the Operating System:
To ensure your operating system is secure, by default, whenever Windows is connected to the internet it will automatically download and install updates without asking. Windows is very through with its update process. As soon as it is finished updating the system will shutdown, install some more updates, and then possibly install the last bit of the updates and apply configurations the next time the computer boots up.

Ubuntu on the other hand tends to be kind of lazy by default with its update process. When a new update is available the system asks you if you want to download and install it. Then, it only installs the updates once. I guess Ubuntu just assumes it installed them correctly the first time.

I think I covered all the points that I often hear people complain about when they first start using Ubuntu. Anyone else know of other areas where Ubuntu is still harder to use than Windows?

In case the point (and my reeking sarcasm) where not conveyed to you in the above paragraphs, my point is this. Ubuntu/Linux really is not any harder to use than Windows is these days. In fact, in many respects it is simply different (in a good way) than what a Windows user is used to. I am tired of hearing from people who try to use Ubuntu for all of two seconds that it is "too hard" to use, because obviou

Available link for download